The concept of force in international politics
States pay little attention to the distribution of power among them, and is seeking as much as possible to maximize their share of world power, and remain on course in search of the mechanisms and strategies of effective, that will enable them to acquire the power that is the focal point in determining the course of international relations, for being one of the most important methods and tools used by the State to achieve their goals and interests, and the achievement of its goals and objectives.
Accordingly, achieving the interest Alqomahlth, requires that the state has a great deal of strength in order to be designated, enabling them to reach and grasp the ends, and thus become a dual power and interest, a goal and a means, connecting both of the other links and bonds and glue, The interests of the state requires to be strong to protect its existence , unity and territorial integrity and security and to achieve most of its objectives, will that end come only possess the power that is the ultimate tool in achieving the goals of the state and its supreme interests.
This dialectic transpires which there is a direct correlation between the strength and pursue interests, because whenever one of them has increased by a specific amount than the other match up with the first increase, and vice versa. Power is the way to achieve the interests, not the interests of it without force able to achieve or protect them on the ground, they are highly sought by countries to protect their interests. The other interest is the very means and at the same time, they are very much as each country seeks to achieve, and is a means to achieve because the interests nutshell contribute to increasing the power of the state. Thus, whenever the state has achieved its interests were strong, and the more powerful the state has managed to achieve their interests.
And spins the concept of power in international politics is usually in the context of describing the ability to others to make respond voluntarily or forcibly acquiesce to what is meant them taking it or abstain, so forcing force a party to abide by and comply with the will and the will of the other party, in the context of specific options, Akhtha and drawn strong party , passing through several levels and stages, beginning with persuasion, through economic influence, and the end of forced coercion.
And indicates the concept of power as naked to the statement of the theory of the case and compare it with other cases, according to the elements and components of accepted measurement and comparison. Thus, it is not true what might seem at first glance that the concept of power that occurs balance goes out to military force only, because this perception, wrong perception and understanding of a minor had his right, without losing sight of the military capabilities of the state is most obvious in the expression of its image in international field. Indeed, the true concept of force extends to the total capacity possessed by each state separately, Kakaddrat military, economic, political, human and other, which affect each other, and is a factor to achieve the State's policy in international relations and the international community, and reinforce the concept of the elements of physical and moral state, because of military force in itself is not enough to create a state of balance, because if she put between supported the weak political will is tough, the strong party will be little effect, and can not be calculated within the balance of power.
Confirming this, the force is generally based on the possession of the state basic items, related to the characteristics and resources, capacity and institutions, which make up the national capabilities of the state, which is known in the literature of international relations elements of state power, any size and the level of available resources of the state, which enable it to impose its choices on others, according to the destination that serve their interests. These elements show the many and varied forms, geographical Kalaattabarat in terms of location, size and topography, population, natural resources that go into the possession of the state, and economic capacities, and military power, and efficiency of the political, diplomatic and propaganda institutions, technological infrastructure, and cultural events, and morale of the people, and others.
To illustrate this, we can mention, for example, that the number of the country's population and wealth are the two pillars and the two main pillars in the construction of the power of the state, it is unreasonable to become one of the few populations and limited resources and wealth density superpowers those countries, as the great powers need to be huge armies can not mobilized only in densely populated countries high. The consequent result is very important is that the population density - that has been exploited optimally - will lead to enormous economic consequences because the large number of people can produce great wealth, especially in light of owning a state technical elements of modern geographic area and other factors of power other supporting each other.
This would explain the cause of concern to the United States from China, which is not due to its military power, which is still relatively weak compared to the US military capabilities, but because China has a population density of large, a better exploitation of the human element, along with its growing economy largely comes in the second largest in the world, after the United States, and possession of scientific and technical many of the elements of power. Thus, China is continuing based approach will end one day to switch to super power, similar to the United States, economically and militarily, scientifically ... etc.
The same applies to Japan, which are classified under the same military government capacity is limited, compared to other major countries, but it has an economic impact of strong international relations, as a result of the impact of its economic potential to the world, especially the Third World, and without military force is increasing regional influence rapidly and is based on the economic relationship with, and the capacity to lead Asia-Pacific in the field of international development.
Despite the overlap of the elements of power and complexity, to make up the overall strength of the state factors, the lesson lies first and foremost in how they are used and exploited optimally efficiently when a State to any external pressure, or for any aggression or imminent danger, or during such a state to impose its approach and values over other countries onlyOther, it is this sense are the proper process of assessing the strength and extent of their impact.
Accordingly, achieving the interest Alqomahlth, requires that the state has a great deal of strength in order to be designated, enabling them to reach and grasp the ends, and thus become a dual power and interest, a goal and a means, connecting both of the other links and bonds and glue, The interests of the state requires to be strong to protect its existence , unity and territorial integrity and security and to achieve most of its objectives, will that end come only possess the power that is the ultimate tool in achieving the goals of the state and its supreme interests.
This dialectic transpires which there is a direct correlation between the strength and pursue interests, because whenever one of them has increased by a specific amount than the other match up with the first increase, and vice versa. Power is the way to achieve the interests, not the interests of it without force able to achieve or protect them on the ground, they are highly sought by countries to protect their interests. The other interest is the very means and at the same time, they are very much as each country seeks to achieve, and is a means to achieve because the interests nutshell contribute to increasing the power of the state. Thus, whenever the state has achieved its interests were strong, and the more powerful the state has managed to achieve their interests.
And spins the concept of power in international politics is usually in the context of describing the ability to others to make respond voluntarily or forcibly acquiesce to what is meant them taking it or abstain, so forcing force a party to abide by and comply with the will and the will of the other party, in the context of specific options, Akhtha and drawn strong party , passing through several levels and stages, beginning with persuasion, through economic influence, and the end of forced coercion.
And indicates the concept of power as naked to the statement of the theory of the case and compare it with other cases, according to the elements and components of accepted measurement and comparison. Thus, it is not true what might seem at first glance that the concept of power that occurs balance goes out to military force only, because this perception, wrong perception and understanding of a minor had his right, without losing sight of the military capabilities of the state is most obvious in the expression of its image in international field. Indeed, the true concept of force extends to the total capacity possessed by each state separately, Kakaddrat military, economic, political, human and other, which affect each other, and is a factor to achieve the State's policy in international relations and the international community, and reinforce the concept of the elements of physical and moral state, because of military force in itself is not enough to create a state of balance, because if she put between supported the weak political will is tough, the strong party will be little effect, and can not be calculated within the balance of power.
Confirming this, the force is generally based on the possession of the state basic items, related to the characteristics and resources, capacity and institutions, which make up the national capabilities of the state, which is known in the literature of international relations elements of state power, any size and the level of available resources of the state, which enable it to impose its choices on others, according to the destination that serve their interests. These elements show the many and varied forms, geographical Kalaattabarat in terms of location, size and topography, population, natural resources that go into the possession of the state, and economic capacities, and military power, and efficiency of the political, diplomatic and propaganda institutions, technological infrastructure, and cultural events, and morale of the people, and others.
To illustrate this, we can mention, for example, that the number of the country's population and wealth are the two pillars and the two main pillars in the construction of the power of the state, it is unreasonable to become one of the few populations and limited resources and wealth density superpowers those countries, as the great powers need to be huge armies can not mobilized only in densely populated countries high. The consequent result is very important is that the population density - that has been exploited optimally - will lead to enormous economic consequences because the large number of people can produce great wealth, especially in light of owning a state technical elements of modern geographic area and other factors of power other supporting each other.
This would explain the cause of concern to the United States from China, which is not due to its military power, which is still relatively weak compared to the US military capabilities, but because China has a population density of large, a better exploitation of the human element, along with its growing economy largely comes in the second largest in the world, after the United States, and possession of scientific and technical many of the elements of power. Thus, China is continuing based approach will end one day to switch to super power, similar to the United States, economically and militarily, scientifically ... etc.
The same applies to Japan, which are classified under the same military government capacity is limited, compared to other major countries, but it has an economic impact of strong international relations, as a result of the impact of its economic potential to the world, especially the Third World, and without military force is increasing regional influence rapidly and is based on the economic relationship with, and the capacity to lead Asia-Pacific in the field of international development.
Despite the overlap of the elements of power and complexity, to make up the overall strength of the state factors, the lesson lies first and foremost in how they are used and exploited optimally efficiently when a State to any external pressure, or for any aggression or imminent danger, or during such a state to impose its approach and values over other countries onlyOther, it is this sense are the proper process of assessing the strength and extent of their impact.
0 التعليقات:
Post a Comment